are available here
Last week, we looked at ethos, pathos, and logos. As we end our first unit, we have focused in on ethos as a way to talk about the ways in which a protest group presents itself.
For your blog post this week, here are some different questions to consider.
Last week we looked at speeches from Stokely Carmichael and Fannie Lou Hamer. This week we examine Freedom Marches, Malachai Richter, and Cindy Sheehan. How would you describe the ethos of one or all of these protests?
Which do you find most persuasive, and why?
What kind of ethos do you find appealing? How has that led to your interest or support of a protest group?
Or, has a group's ethos had a negative effect on your support for them?